Software comparison · Verified July 2026

Arrange vs TeamOhana for headcount planning

TeamOhana is a headcount management platform that connects Finance, Talent, and budget owners around hiring, reconciliation, and approval workflows. Arrange focuses on the leader's visual organization plan and a versioned funding ledger. TeamOhana is stronger when operational reconciliation is the immediate need; Arrange is designed to make the planning artifact itself compute.

AreaArrangeTeamOhana
Primary starting pointDraw and price a proposed organization before setup or integrationOperational headcount tracker connected to ATS, HRIS, and approval workflows
Organization modelingDirect canvas, editable grid, reporting structure, scenarios, and cost in one planDynamic org chart in Professional and higher packages
Recruiting operationsPlanning statuses and approved positions, not an ATS workboardHiring tracker, recruiting workboard, reconciliation, and ATS integrations
Try before buyingOne local plan free forever; paid features get a no-card trialRequest-a-quote sales motion
Public starting price$0 Free; Pro planned at $29 monthly; Team planned at $149 monthly$15,000 per year Essentials; Professional starts at $30,000 per year
Scenario workflowScenarios are branches with exact diffs and a combine recordScenario planning is a Professional add-on and included in Enterprise

TeamOhana publicly lists Essentials at $15,000 per year for up to 250 employees and Professional starting at $30,000 per year for up to 250 employees. Pricing was checked on July 29, 2026. Check TeamOhana pricing.

Arrange is likely the better fit when

  • Leaders still plan in PowerPoint plus spreadsheets
  • The first need is rapid visual modeling and cost comparison
  • The team wants self-serve adoption before operational integrations
  • Approval history must retain exact plan versions and conditions

TeamOhana is likely the better fit when

  • Talent and Finance need an operational headcount control plane
  • ATS and HRIS reconciliation is a core requirement on day one
  • Recruiting workboards, backfill workflows, and variance tracking lead the purchase
  • The organization has budget and implementation capacity for an annual platform contract

Planning artifact versus operating control plane

TeamOhana's public packaging centers hiring tracking, requests, recruiting operations, budget variance, and system reconciliation. Arrange centers the proposed organization as a visual and financial object. Both can participate in headcount approval, but they enter the process at different moments.

Arrange is most useful before a requisition exists, when leaders are weighing structure, capability, timing, and funding. TeamOhana becomes more useful when approved headcount must remain reconciled across Finance, Talent, HRIS, and ATS systems.

How to evaluate both

Start with the same business case: a product group wants three hires, Finance offers a constrained envelope, and Talent needs an approved hiring sequence. In Arrange, evaluate how quickly the leader can create and explain the scenarios. In TeamOhana, evaluate how well the approved positions reconcile with recruiting and employee systems.

A company may ultimately use both categories. The planning record can define what should happen, while the headcount operations platform tracks what did happen. The integration boundary should be an approved position and its funding context, not a manually copied row.

The pricing decision

TeamOhana's public pricing reflects a guided, integrated platform: $15,000 per year for Essentials and $30,000 per year for Professional at up to 250 employees. Arrange is intentionally priced as a self-serve planning tool, with one free local plan and workspace-based paid tiers.

That is why Arrange does not require a card before value. A leader should be able to discover whether a computing org plan is useful before asking the company to adopt another operating system.

Frequently asked questions

Does Arrange include ATS and HRIS reconciliation?

Not today. Arrange focuses on planning, scenario review, and the decision ledger. TeamOhana is the better fit when operational system reconciliation is the primary requirement.

Does TeamOhana include scenario planning?

Its public pricing page lists scenario planning as an add-on for Professional and as included in Enterprise.

Can Arrange be used before company integrations are ready?

Yes. A leader can begin with templates, benchmark rates, PowerPoint, or Excel and build a local plan without an account.

Test the planning workflow before you buy a platform.

Create a costed plan and one alternative scenario in Arrange without a card.

Start planning freeNo credit card. Your first plan stays free.